The canon and metrology

Etymology of canon: Cf. (Burkert, 1992) p. 34.

In lecture 4M we mentionned Geometro-Archeology, as a branch of megalithomania, which is of course the mania of the pyramidiots. This is also known as archeo-geometry, or ancient geometry, which is our main subject. Included in this subject, then, is a fascination called metrology, the study of units of measure, or canon. And in the chronology of lecture 4M we noted two mathematicians:

Cf. (Tompkins, 1971) pp. 21-33.

Greaves was Savillian Professor of Astronomy at Oxford, and author of a book called Pyramidographia, in which he presented his results. His explorations were motivated by a hope of discovering the size of the planet Earth. His outlook was essentially that of ancient Alexandria, that is, of the Renaissance.

But Newton is, of course, among the first of the moderns, as far as the orthodox history of mathematics is concerned. His two cubits were determined from different sources, both ancient:

Like Greaves, he hoped to determine the size of the Earth from these measures. This hope belongs to the paradigm of ancient geometry, not to modern physics. For it is based on one of the key ideas of pyramidiocy: the size of the base of the Great Pyramid is a simple fraction of the circumference of the equator! And this length, supposedly more accurate than the astronomical determination of Eratosthenes in ancient Alexandria, must have come down from the prisci theologia, or directly from the Creator. In other words, the Great Pyramid is on the same level of the canon as the Bible.

This geometrology, determination of the size of the planet, was essential for Newton to check his universal gravitational theory, published in 1687.

Here we see the actual joint between the ancient paradigm and the modern! Another outstanding feature of the tapestry.


Ralph H. Abraham, 20 May 1996.